Khattabi v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited
The Court refused an application that the judge step aside from an employment case because of her membership of the airline's Chairman's Lounge, finding no actual or apprehended bias arose from lounge membership alone.
What it means for business
It may be worth noting the threshold set here before advising a client to run a recusal application on association grounds.
What does this mean for your business?
If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.
Talk to Envision LegalMore in Employment
8 September 2026 · Federal Court
Totino v Metro Trains Melbourne Pty Ltd
7 September 2026 · Treasury
Reform to non-compete clauses and other restraints, draft legislation
28 August 2026 · Queensland Legislation
Work Health and Safety (Codes of Practice) Amendment Notice 2026
18 August 2026 · ASIC
RG 49 Employee incentive schemes (updated)
Regulatory alerts
Get the radar in your inbox.
A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.
This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.