Envision Legal
← More case law

ASIC v Star Investment Group Australia Pty Ltd

15 September 2026HighCourt decisions[2026] FCA 1380

The development

On 15 September 2026 the Federal Court made interim orders against Star Investment Group Australia Pty Ltd, Gondal Holdings Pty Ltd and their director, Ijaz Ahmad, on an ex parte application by ASIC. Justice Anderson found reasonable grounds to suspect contraventions of the Corporations Act and the ASIC Act and ordered that it was necessary to protect investors while ASIC's investigation continues.

The companies had raised about 19.1 million dollars from around 111 investors through instruments described as promissory or convertible notes, to fund a proposed resort development at Yallourn in Victoria's Latrobe Valley. ASIC's evidence pointed to incomplete financial records, transfers of investor funds overseas including to Pakistan, an absence of registered security over the development land despite purported security arrangements, and bank accounts with low balances that were later closed.

The Court restrained the defendants from dealing with or dissipating their property, ordered disclosure of assets and liabilities, and restrained Mr Ahmad from leaving Australia if he returns. A bona fide sale of the development land was not prevented, provided proceeds are preserved. The matter was listed for a further hearing, at which ASIC sought and the Court later granted the appointment of receivers over the companies' and Mr Ahmad's property.

At this stage the findings relate only to the making of interim protective orders. The defendants had not appeared or had an opportunity to respond when the orders were made, and no findings of contravention have been determined on a final basis.

The briefing

Regulator or source
Federal Court
Type
Case · Court decisions
Subject matter
Financial services & insurance
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
15 September 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
[2026] FCA 1380
Priority
High

What it means for business

This matter is a reminder that funding arrangements described as notes or debt instruments can still amount to an unregistered managed investment scheme if investor money is pooled and returns depend on a common enterprise. Businesses structuring property or development funding through promissory or convertible notes could review whether registration, disclosure or licensing obligations under the Corporations Act apply, particularly where funds are pooled from multiple investors and security arrangements are not formally registered. Advisers to issuers of similar instruments may also wish to check record keeping and the accuracy of representations made to investors about security over underlying assets, given these were specific concerns raised in the proceeding.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote