Reform to non-compete clauses and other restraints, draft legislation
Submissions closed 2 October 2026.
The development
On 7 September 2026, the Government released exposure draft legislation, the Competition and Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Banning Unfair Non-Competes) Bill 2026, which would prohibit non-compete clauses in employment arrangements for employees earning below the Fair Work Act high income threshold of 190,100 dollars. The draft Bill would also prohibit enforcement of existing non-compete terms that fall within the ban and would prohibit non-solicitation terms affecting co-workers for all employees regardless of income.
The draft Bill proposes to expand the cartel conduct provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 so that no-poach and wage-fixing arrangements between businesses are treated as cartel conduct, and separately proposes a ban on cascading restraint of trade clauses. The term non-compete is defined broadly to capture any term or condition of employment, including terms in deeds, workplace policies or unwritten arrangements, that limits an employee's ability to be involved in another business or to commence subsequent employment after leaving. The proposed prohibitions on non-compete terms would not apply to non-employment arrangements such as sale of business agreements or shareholder agreements.
The Government has said these reforms are intended to improve wage growth, labour mobility and productivity, citing research suggesting around one in five Australian workers are currently subject to a non-compete clause. Submissions on the exposure draft close on 2 October 2026 through the Treasury Consultation Hub. The legislation remains in draft form and has not been introduced into Parliament.
The briefing
- Regulator or source
- Treasury
- Type
- Exposure draft
- Subject matter
- Employment
- Jurisdiction
- Cth
- Published
- 7 September 2026
- Submissions close
- 2 October 2026
- Reference
- c2026-801178
- Priority
- High
What it means for business
Employers that use non-compete clauses, co-worker non-solicitation terms or cascading restraints in employment contracts, particularly for staff earning below the high income threshold, may wish to review those clauses against the exposure draft ahead of any final legislation. Businesses negotiating sale of business agreements that rely on restraint of trade clauses should note the draft Bill does not currently extend the non-compete ban to those arrangements, though definitions and scope may change before introduction. Businesses with no-poach or wage-fixing arrangements with competitors could consider the implications of those arrangements being treated as cartel conduct.
Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.
What does this mean for your business?
If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.
Request a fixed-fee scopeMore in Employment
16 September 2026 · Court decisions · Federal Court
Khattabi v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited
8 September 2026 · Court decisions · Federal Court
Totino v Metro Trains Melbourne Pty Ltd
28 August 2026 · Instruments & regulations · Queensland Legislation
Work Health and Safety (Codes of Practice) Amendment Notice 2026
18 August 2026 · Guidance · ASIC
RG 49 Employee incentive schemes (updated)
More from Treasury
18 September 2026 · Consultations · Treasury
Establishing External Reporting Australia's standard-setting boards
11 September 2026 · Exposure drafts · Treasury
Better targeting the Research and Development Tax Incentive, exposure draft
9 September 2026 · Exposure drafts · Treasury
ACCC service of documents, exposure draft amendment
7 September 2026 · Consultations · Treasury
Charity secrecy reform, deregistration and finalised investigations
Regulatory alerts
Get the radar in your inbox.
A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.
This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.
