Envision Legal
← More enforcement

Origin Energy to refund customers after ACCC investigation

14 July 2026MediumEnforcement80/26

The development

The ACCC announced on 14 July 2026 that Origin Energy Limited will refund more than 270,000 dollars to over 4,500 customers following an ACCC investigation into representations made about its Ongoing Saver residential electricity plan. The investigation arose from a designated complaint made by consumer group CHOICE about energy retailers allegedly misrepresenting savings or value to consumers. The ACCC was concerned that statements in the Ongoing Saver plan's terms and conditions, and on customer bills, represented that charges would be lower than under Origin's Basic plan for the life of the plan, when in fact some customers on the Ongoing Saver plan were charged more than they would have been on the Basic plan.

Origin has not admitted a breach of the Australian Consumer Law, but in response to the ACCC's concerns it has committed to refunding affected customers an average of around 60 dollars each, discontinuing the Ongoing Saver plan, and not using plan names that suggest savings unless those savings are built into the plan. ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said electricity retailers that claim or suggest savings for consumers, including through a plan's name, must ensure those savings are actually delivered for the life of the plan, noting that the complexity of energy plans makes it difficult for many consumers to assess potential savings.

As this was an investigation resolved through Origin's voluntary commitments rather than a court proceeding, there has been no judicial finding that Origin breached the Australian Consumer Law. The matter nonetheless signals continuing ACCC and CHOICE scrutiny of savings and loyalty-related claims made by energy retailers and other essential services providers.

The briefing

Regulator or source
ACCC
Type
Enforcement
Subject matter
Commercial, corporate & consumer
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
14 July 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
80/26
Priority
Medium

What it means for business

Energy retailers and other businesses that market plans using savings, loyalty or discount language could review whether their plan names and marketing claims are substantiated by an actual comparison against the relevant alternative plan, particularly where a plan's name itself implies an ongoing saving. Businesses could check that bills and account communications do not repeat a savings claim that is not being delivered in practice, and that any plan described as providing an ongoing lower rate is monitored over time to confirm that remains true as other plans or pricing change. This matter was resolved by voluntary refunds and commitments rather than a court finding of contravention.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote