Envision Legal
← More enforcement

Court finds eHarmony engaged in misleading conduct in relation to automatic renewal and pricing of its subscriptions

25 August 2026HighEnforcement99/26

The development

The Federal Court found that dating platform eHarmony, Inc breached the Australian Consumer Law by engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct in statements made on its website and app, in proceedings brought by the ACCC. The findings concerned representations about free dating when consumers could not in fact engage in ongoing communication with other members without paying, the automatic renewal of memberships, and the advertising of one month memberships when the minimum sign up period was six months.

The Court also found that eHarmony misrepresented that consumers could cancel their subscription early when they could not, and stated monthly subscription prices without disclosing an additional mandatory fee payable when a consumer chose to pay monthly rather than in a lump sum. In addition, the Court found that eHarmony failed to display, as a single figure alongside its monthly price statements, the minimum total amount a consumer would pay for the subscription, in breach of the single price requirement in the Australian Consumer Law.

ACCC Commissioner Luke Woodward said the action followed hundreds of consumer complaints about charges from eHarmony, and that consumers were not adequately informed about membership duration or automatic renewal, including renewal in some cases at a substantially higher price. The Court has yet to determine penalties and other relief, with the parties directed to file proposed orders following the liability findings.

The decision concerns a subscription service, but the underlying findings relate to general requirements under the Australian Consumer Law for price disclosure, renewal terms and the accuracy of free offer claims that apply across sectors offering subscriptions.

The briefing

Regulator or source
ACCC
Type
Enforcement
Subject matter
Commercial, corporate & consumer
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
25 August 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
99/26
Priority
High

What it means for business

Businesses offering subscription or membership services with automatic renewal could review whether their advertised pricing displays the single minimum total price a consumer will pay, rather than only a monthly instalment figure, and whether any additional fees for monthly payment are disclosed alongside the headline price. It may be worth checking that statements about free access, minimum membership terms and cancellation rights match what is actually offered and reflect any restrictions in the terms and conditions. Renewal terms, including any price increase on renewal, could usefully be disclosed clearly at the point of sign up rather than only in lengthy terms documents.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote