Privacy Commissioner completes preliminary inquiries into Qantas 2025 data incident
The development
The Australian Privacy Commissioner published a report on 16 July 2026 concluding the OAIC's preliminary inquiries into the 2025 Qantas Airways Limited data breach, which affected approximately 5.12 million Australians. The breach arose from a social engineering attack, in which a threat actor impersonating Qantas IT support contacted an overseas third-party contact centre provider and obtained access that enabled mass extraction of customer data, including personal information and frequent flyer details, from the customer relationship management platform used by Qantas.
Following close to a year of inquiries, during which Qantas provided information and documents to the regulator, Commissioner Carly Kind concluded that the evidence did not support a likelihood that Qantas had failed to take reasonable steps to protect the personal information it held, or that it had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure its overseas third-party provider complied with the Australian Privacy Principles covering management, cross-border disclosure and security of personal information. On that basis, the Commissioner determined it would not be proportionate for the OAIC to commence a full investigation or take further action at this stage.
The Commissioner's findings are described as provisional, and the OAIC retains discretion to open a formal investigation later if new information emerges. The matter illustrates that preliminary inquiries into a large-scale breach will closely examine both an entity's own security measures and the steps taken to ensure compliance by third-party providers handling personal information on its behalf, even where those inquiries conclude without further action.
The briefing
- Regulator or source
- OAIC
- Type
- Enforcement
- Subject matter
- Privacy, data & AI
- Jurisdiction
- Cth
- Published
- 16 July 2026
- Submissions close
- No deadline
- Reference
- Not applicable
- Priority
- Medium
What it means for business
Organisations that outsource customer-facing functions involving personal information, such as call centre or contact centre services, may wish to review what personal information is accessible to those providers, what authentication and verification steps are required before access is granted, and what the outsourcing contract says about security standards, incident notification timeframes and audit rights. Because the OAIC examined both Qantas's own protections and its oversight of the third-party provider before reaching its conclusion, similar scrutiny of outsourced arrangements can be expected in any comparable large-scale breach, even where the findings do not ultimately support further regulatory action.
Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.
What does this mean for your business?
If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.
Request a fixed-fee scopeMore in Privacy, data & AI
11 September 2026 · Consultations · ASIC
CP 391 Access to information on the companies register
31 August 2026 · Exposure drafts · Attorney-General's Department
Privacy Amendment (Personal Data Protection) Bill 2026 exposure draft
31 August 2026 · Media releases · Attorney-General's Department
Modernising Australia's privacy laws for the digital age
27 August 2026 · Reports · APRA
Insights from the APRA-ASIC Industry Roundtables
More from OAIC
20 August 2026 · Consultations · OAIC
Draft Children's Online Privacy Code
11 August 2026 · Consultations · OAIC
Consultation on Part 14 of the FOI Guidelines: Disclosure Log
7 August 2026 · Reports · OAIC
OAIC review highlights opportunities to strengthen transparency
29 July 2026 · Guidance · OAIC
Privacy Commissioner publishes updated guidance on facial recognition in retail spaces
Regulatory alerts
Get the radar in your inbox.
A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.
This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.
