Privacy Commissioner publishes updated guidance on facial recognition in retail spaces
The development
The OAIC published updates on 29 July 2026 to its guidance for entities considering using facial recognition technology in high volume, publicly accessible physical spaces such as retail stores. The update follows a February 2026 decision of the Administrative Review Tribunal, which affirmed aspects of the Privacy Commissioner's November 2024 determination against Bunnings Group Limited concerning its use of the technology in 62 stores between 2018 and 2021.
The Tribunal found that Bunnings was entitled to use facial recognition for the limited purpose of combatting significant retail crime and protecting staff and customers, given the particular threats the retailer faced, but it did not disturb findings that the deployment had not been properly notified to customers. The OAIC's updated guidance incorporates this clarification and provides more detail on how exceptions to the requirement for consent when collecting sensitive information, including biometric information, may apply in retail settings under the Australian Privacy Principles.
The guidance sets out considerations across accountability and privacy impact assessments, the lawful basis for collecting sensitive information, transparency and notification obligations, accuracy and bias, and data deletion and security. The Privacy Commissioner said the Bunnings decision provided important clarification on aspects of the Privacy Act and that each proposed deployment of facial recognition will still need to be assessed against the requirements of the Act, describing a precautionary approach as required under Australian law.
A separate determination against Kmart Australia Limited concerning its use of the technology, issued in August 2025, remains under review before the Administrative Review Tribunal, so that matter has not been finally resolved.
The briefing
- Regulator or source
- OAIC
- Type
- Guidance
- Subject matter
- Privacy, data & AI
- Jurisdiction
- Cth
- Published
- 29 July 2026
- Submissions close
- No deadline
- Reference
- Not applicable
- Priority
- High
What it means for business
Retailers using or considering facial recognition technology could test any existing or planned deployment against the updated guidance, with particular attention to whether a privacy impact assessment has been completed and documented, whether an exception to consent genuinely applies given the entity's specific security context, and whether customers have been properly notified. Given the Tribunal's findings turned on the particular threats faced by the retailer in question, businesses may want to document the specific risks their own stores face rather than relying on a general industry justification. Legal teams could also monitor the outcome of the separate Kmart review, since it may provide further guidance on notification obligations.
Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.
What does this mean for your business?
If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.
Request a fixed-fee scopeMore in Privacy, data & AI
11 September 2026 · Consultations · ASIC
CP 391 Access to information on the companies register
31 August 2026 · Exposure drafts · Attorney-General's Department
Privacy Amendment (Personal Data Protection) Bill 2026 exposure draft
31 August 2026 · Media releases · Attorney-General's Department
Modernising Australia's privacy laws for the digital age
27 August 2026 · Reports · APRA
Insights from the APRA-ASIC Industry Roundtables
More from OAIC
20 August 2026 · Consultations · OAIC
Draft Children's Online Privacy Code
11 August 2026 · Consultations · OAIC
Consultation on Part 14 of the FOI Guidelines: Disclosure Log
7 August 2026 · Reports · OAIC
OAIC review highlights opportunities to strengthen transparency
16 July 2026 · Enforcement · OAIC
Privacy Commissioner completes preliminary inquiries into Qantas 2025 data incident
Regulatory alerts
Get the radar in your inbox.
A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.
This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.
