Envision Legal
← More guidance & reports

Privacy Commissioner publishes updated guidance on facial recognition in retail spaces

29 July 2026HighGuidance

The development

The OAIC published updates on 29 July 2026 to its guidance for entities considering using facial recognition technology in high volume, publicly accessible physical spaces such as retail stores. The update follows a February 2026 decision of the Administrative Review Tribunal, which affirmed aspects of the Privacy Commissioner's November 2024 determination against Bunnings Group Limited concerning its use of the technology in 62 stores between 2018 and 2021.

The Tribunal found that Bunnings was entitled to use facial recognition for the limited purpose of combatting significant retail crime and protecting staff and customers, given the particular threats the retailer faced, but it did not disturb findings that the deployment had not been properly notified to customers. The OAIC's updated guidance incorporates this clarification and provides more detail on how exceptions to the requirement for consent when collecting sensitive information, including biometric information, may apply in retail settings under the Australian Privacy Principles.

The guidance sets out considerations across accountability and privacy impact assessments, the lawful basis for collecting sensitive information, transparency and notification obligations, accuracy and bias, and data deletion and security. The Privacy Commissioner said the Bunnings decision provided important clarification on aspects of the Privacy Act and that each proposed deployment of facial recognition will still need to be assessed against the requirements of the Act, describing a precautionary approach as required under Australian law.

A separate determination against Kmart Australia Limited concerning its use of the technology, issued in August 2025, remains under review before the Administrative Review Tribunal, so that matter has not been finally resolved.

The briefing

Regulator or source
OAIC
Type
Guidance
Subject matter
Privacy, data & AI
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
29 July 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
Not applicable
Priority
High

What it means for business

Retailers using or considering facial recognition technology could test any existing or planned deployment against the updated guidance, with particular attention to whether a privacy impact assessment has been completed and documented, whether an exception to consent genuinely applies given the entity's specific security context, and whether customers have been properly notified. Given the Tribunal's findings turned on the particular threats faced by the retailer in question, businesses may want to document the specific risks their own stores face rather than relying on a general industry justification. Legal teams could also monitor the outcome of the separate Kmart review, since it may provide further guidance on notification obligations.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote