Envision Legal
← More guidance & reports

Kimberly-Clark's acquisition of Kenvue approved subject to sale of Carefree and Stayfree brands

2 September 2026MediumMedia releases

The development

The ACCC has approved Kimberly-Clark Corporation's acquisition of Kenvue Inc, part of a global transaction reported at around 40 billion US dollars, on condition that Kimberly-Clark divests Kenvue's Carefree and Stayfree period care brands in Australia to a purchaser approved by the ACCC. The decision, announced on 2 September 2026, is the fourth acquisition cleared with conditions under Australia's current merger control regime.

Kimberly-Clark and Kenvue are two of the three major suppliers of period care products in Australia, with Kimberly-Clark trading under the U by Kotex brand and Kenvue under Carefree and Stayfree, alongside Essity, which supplies Libra and TOM Organic. ACCC Commissioner Dr Philip Williams said the ACCC considered that without divestiture of the Carefree and Stayfree brands, the acquisition could substantially lessen competition in the supply of period care products in Australia by reducing the number of major suppliers from three to two. The divestiture condition is intended to preserve an independent competitor in that market and maintain the level of competition that would otherwise be lost through the acquisition. A similar divestment undertaking was required by New Zealand's Commerce Commission in respect of the same brands in that market.

Dr Williams said the outcome demonstrates that the merger regime can address competition concerns flexibly while still allowing transactions to proceed without undue delay. For businesses considering acquisitions in concentrated Australian markets, the decision illustrates that the ACCC continues to use structural remedies such as brand or business divestiture as a tool for resolving competition concerns, rather than limiting its response to either unconditional clearance or outright prohibition.

The briefing

Regulator or source
ACCC
Type
Media release
Subject matter
Commercial, corporate & consumer
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
2 September 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
Not applicable
Priority
Medium

What it means for business

Businesses planning acquisitions in concentrated Australian markets may wish to factor a possible divestiture remedy into deal timing and pricing from an early stage, rather than assuming the ACCC's review will result only in unconditional clearance or prohibition. Where an overlap exists between merging parties in a market with few competitors, it may be worth identifying which assets or brands could realistically be divested to an ACCC-approved purchaser if a competition concern is raised during review.

Counterparties and financiers involved in such transactions may also want to consider how a conditional clearance, including the timeframe for completing a divestiture, is addressed in transaction documents and completion conditions.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote