Envision Legal
← More enforcement

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank admits to breaching its BEAR obligations

11 August 2026MediumEnforcement

The development

APRA announced on 11 August 2026 that Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited has admitted breaching its obligations under the Banking Executive Accountability Regime in connection with a 2023 cyber attack affecting its Alliance Bank business. APRA commenced civil penalty proceedings against the bank in the Federal Court on 10 August 2026, and the parties filed an agreed statement of facts and admissions.

The admitted facts describe significant weaknesses in customer authentication controls for Alliance Bank online banking, including password settings that permitted very weak passwords, multiple customer accounts sharing identical passwords, and system design features that allowed a threat actor to identify valid customer identifications. A number of these weaknesses had been identified by penetration testing conducted in 2020 but were not addressed before the attack. Between 3 and 7 March 2023, an unidentified attacker gained access to approximately 257 customer accounts and made 286 unauthorised transactions totalling around 490,000 dollars affecting 87 customers; Bendigo Bank was unable to recover about 140,000 dollars of this amount but reimbursed all affected customers.

Bendigo Bank has admitted failing to maintain adequate customer authentication controls and failing to undertake a systematic testing program for those controls, in breach of its obligations under the Banking Act 1959 that underpin the Banking Executive Accountability Regime. The matter remains before the Federal Court for determination of penalty. It illustrates that a cyber incident traced to inadequate technical controls can itself found an accountability regime contravention, separate from any direct consumer harm claims arising from the same incident.

The briefing

Regulator or source
APRA
Type
Enforcement
Subject matter
Financial services & insurance
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
11 August 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
Not applicable
Priority
Medium

What it means for business

Authorised deposit-taking institutions may wish to check whether known weaknesses identified through penetration testing or other security reviews have been remediated within a reasonable timeframe, since unaddressed findings of that kind contributed to the admitted contravention in this matter. It may also be worth confirming that cyber incident response plans and customer authentication control testing programs map clearly to the accountable persons named under the Banking Executive Accountability Regime or its successor, so that responsibility for remediation of known control weaknesses is clearly assigned before an incident occurs rather than after.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote