Envision Legal
← More enforcement

APRA takes action to address material liquidity breaches by ING Australia

3 September 2026HighEnforcement

The development

APRA announced on 3 September 2026 that it has imposed licence conditions on ING Bank Australia Limited after the bank identified material miscalculations in its liquidity position over several years. ING Australia had been reporting a Liquidity Coverage Ratio of around 160 per cent, but its true LCR was substantially lower and at times fell below the 100 per cent minimum required by Prudential Standard APS 210 Liquidity. ING Australia notified APRA of the issue in July 2026 and has since raised its liquidity position above APRA's minimum requirements.

APRA's licence conditions require ING Australia to commission independent reviews into the causes of the liquidity reporting failures and into its broader risk management and governance practices, to develop a remediation plan addressing the weaknesses identified, and to obtain independent assurance that remediation has been effectively implemented. APRA has also raised ING Australia's minimum liquidity requirements and imposed a 50 million dollar operational risk capital add-on to address heightened operational risk and potential broader weaknesses in prudential reporting.

APRA Deputy Chair Therese McCarthy Hockey said the breaches were serious notwithstanding that ING Australia, which has more than 2 million customers and assets exceeding 100 billion dollars, remains financially resilient. She said the inability to accurately measure a core prudential safeguard raised questions about the effectiveness of the bank's risk management and controls. The capital add-on, increased liquidity requirement and licence conditions will stay in place until APRA is satisfied the required remediation work is complete.

The briefing

Regulator or source
APRA
Type
Enforcement
Subject matter
Financial services & insurance
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
3 September 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
Not applicable
Priority
High

What it means for business

Authorised deposit-taking institutions and other APRA-regulated entities could use this matter as a prompt to independently validate the calculation logic, data lineage and system controls behind key prudential metrics such as the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, rather than relying solely on the metric's reported output. Boards and risk committees may wish to confirm that internal audit or an equivalent independent function periodically tests whether prudential reporting reflects the underlying methodology set out in the relevant prudential standard. Entities that identify a similar miscalculation may want to consider their own notification obligations to APRA promptly, consistent with the approach ING Australia is reported to have taken.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote