Envision Legal
← More guidance & reports

Three super funds issued infringement notices for misleading investment disclosures

8 September 2026HighMedia releases26-212MR

The development

ASIC issued six infringement notices totalling 118,800 dollars to the trustees of three superannuation funds, Australian Retirement Trust Pty Ltd, Tetra Servicing Pty Ltd formerly known as Telstra Super Pty Ltd, and Australian Meat Industry Superannuation Pty Ltd as trustee of Australian Food Super, each receiving two notices totalling 39,600 dollars. The notices followed a targeted ASIC review of disclosures published on superannuation trustee websites.

ASIC held concerns that the disclosures did not match how the relevant investment options were actually managed. For AMIST, the Alternatives Option was described on its website and in a Member Outcomes Assessment Summary as invested entirely in private equity, when international shares held through an iShares fund in fact made up a significant proportion of the option. For Telstra Super, its Property Option webpage stated a seven year time horizon for setting and measuring the return objective, which did not reflect the time horizon actually used.

Australian Retirement Trust and Telstra Super have paid the amounts under their infringement notices, and AMIST has agreed to pay. ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant said members rely on trustees for accurate information about investment options, asset allocation and performance objectives, and that trustees should regularly review disclosures to ensure they remain current and consistent with how options are managed. Payment of an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention.

The briefing

Regulator or source
ASIC
Type
Media release
Subject matter
Financial services & insurance
Jurisdiction
Cth
Published
8 September 2026
Submissions close
No deadline
Reference
26-212MR
Priority
High

What it means for business

Superannuation trustees could use this action as a basis to review website and member disclosure content, including asset allocation statements, time horizon assumptions and Member Outcomes Assessment Summaries, against the actual composition and management of each investment option. A periodic reconciliation process between disclosure teams and investment or portfolio management functions may help identify drift between published descriptions and underlying holdings before it becomes a compliance issue. Legal and compliance teams may also wish to confirm who is responsible for updating investment option disclosures when underlying asset allocations change.

Entry last reviewed 9 October 2026.

What does this mean for your business?

If this development touches your contracts, compliance or reporting, it may be worth a short conversation. Get in touch through our contact page and a senior lawyer will reply within one business day.

Request a fixed-fee scope

Regulatory alerts

Get the radar in your inbox.

A short email when something worth knowing lands. Pick the areas you care about and skip the rest.

Areas of interest

By subscribing you consent to receive these updates. Your address is used only for this purpose and you can unsubscribe at any time. See our privacy policy.

This register contains general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Envision Legal accepts no liability for any loss arising from reliance on this content. You should seek independent legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. For enquiries, contact Envision Legal.

Send a briefFixed-fee quote