Guides · Commercial Contracts Guide · Chapter 4 of 6
MSAs, SOWs and framework agreements
Last reviewed 14 August 2026
How master agreements and statements of work fit together, and how to avoid the inconsistencies that undo them.
In short
A master services agreement sets the legal terms once; each engagement is then documented in a short statement of work covering scope, price and timing. The structure lets you close repeat work quickly — provided the SOW does not quietly contradict the MSA.
Once a supplier relationship is going to produce more than one engagement, negotiating a full agreement each time is wasted effort. The master agreement plus statement of work structure exists to stop that.
What belongs in the MSA
- Parties, term and the mechanism for entering SOWs.
- General obligations, standards of performance and personnel provisions.
- Payment machinery, invoicing and interest.
- IP ownership and licensing defaults.
- Confidentiality, privacy and security obligations.
- Warranties, indemnities, liability cap and insurance.
- Termination (of a SOW and of the MSA), suspension and transition-out.
- Dispute resolution, governing law and the order of precedence.
What belongs in the SOW
- Scope of services and deliverables, with exclusions.
- Timetable, milestones and dependencies.
- Price, payment schedule and any rate card.
- Named personnel and required resources.
- Acceptance criteria and testing.
- Any project-specific service levels or variations to the MSA — expressly flagged as variations.
A SOW should be short. If it is running past a few pages of legal terms, the terms belong in the MSA.
The failure modes
- Precedence unstated. Decide up front whether the MSA or the SOW wins. The usual answer is that the MSA prevails except where the SOW expressly says it is varying a numbered clause.
- Liability caps that reset per SOW — or do not. Suppliers generally want a per-SOW cap; customers want an aggregate cap across the relationship. It should be stated, not assumed.
- Work starting before the SOW is signed. Extremely common, and it puts you back to arguing about an unwritten arrangement.
- Termination misalignment. Terminating the MSA should not silently kill SOWs already in flight unless that is intended; say what happens to live engagements.
- Purchase order terms sneaking in. Customer POs often carry their own terms on the reverse. The MSA should expressly exclude them.
Framework and panel agreements
Government and large corporate buyers often use panel or framework arrangements: you are appointed to a panel with no guaranteed volume, and work is awarded by order under standing terms. Two things matter here — whether you can meet the standing terms on the worst possible order, and whether exclusivity or minimum volume commitments cut across your other customers. Panel terms are rarely negotiable in full, but the risk clauses often are, particularly insurance and liability.
Subcontracting
If you subcontract any part of a scope, the subcontract should be back-to-back with the head agreement on the terms that matter: liability, indemnities, IP, confidentiality, insurance, and payment timing. A subcontract on more generous terms than the head contract means you carry the gap.
Where this fits
We prepare MSA and SOW suites — including a plain-English SOW template your team can complete without going back to a lawyer each time — as a fixed-fee package. See MSA templates in Australia.
Talk to us
Want this applied to your business?
Send us a note about what you're working on. We'll respond within one business day and, if we're a fit, book a free 15-minute consultation with a senior lawyer.
All chapters
- 01The anatomy of a commercial agreement
- 02Scope, price and payment
- 03Risk: warranties, indemnities and liability
- 04MSAs, SOWs and framework agreements
- 05Negotiating without a legal team
- 06Signing, varying and ending a contract